Muddy billion views

News

This week (May 6-12, 2024), the official Youtube channel of the Publishing House “Belarus Today” reached one billion views on it.
Let’s examine why there is no reason to be proud of this “achievement.”


As early as March 2022, this channel had quite modest metrics across all indicators (number of views, subscribers):

Suddenly, it took the top spot in April 2022 in terms of the number of video views posted during the month, based on data collected using Buzzsumo YouTube Analyzer.
After that, rapid growth began, which can be tracked using data collected by the SocialBlade service:

That is, within two years, the channel reached one million subscribers and over a billion video views posted.

For one million YouTube subscribers, according to the “Creator Awards”, a Gold Award is given:

But now the delivery of this award is restricted to Belarus.

If you consider that YouTube pays between 1000 and 2000 US dollars per million views, the SB TV channel could have earned between 1 and 2 million dollars in revenue.

Of course, the production of content posted during this period was much more expensive. From the perspective of causing damage to Belarus’s information security, as a source of disinformation, it’s impossible to estimate in money.

Why?

Let’s look at the titles of the videos that brought in the first “crazy” millions of views in April 2022:

Three hundred abandoned wounded soldiers of a Ukrainian hospital were rescued by Russian troops in Donbass 4654925
Polish diplomats were seen off with a military march and the letter Z in Kaliningrad 3447634
Tormented Russian military – official detained for fakes about the operation in Ukraine 2556528
Bombing of the “Azovstal” plant in Mariupol from flight altitude 2418895
The twice-hit BTR of Russian marines blew up on a mine and survived in battle at “Azovstal” 2408194
Putin canceled the assault on “Azovstal” | Mariupol liberated | Life preserved for those who surrendered 2217414
Combat against the “Azov” battalion filmed from inside a Russian armored personnel carrier – destruction of a firing point 2149357
Ukrainian refugees overwhelmed Armenians – they were given a final warning 2074479
DNR special forces stopped an attempt to break through by the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Mariupol 1872077
A column moves towards Kharkiv | Residents of the Kharkiv region joyously welcome the Russian Army 1854089
Why did bulldozers come to the “Katyn” memorial? 1806120
Russian Su-34s covered “Azov” militants’ fortifications with airstrikes 1586551
Footage appeared of the work of the “Iskander” OTRK on the command post of the Armed Forces of Ukraine | Missile strike 1410235
Combat work of DNR army tanks on the approaches to “Azovstal” in Mariupol – clearing positions of militants 1358272
Denazification of Lviv in four acts! 1353354
Another brave grandmother put a Banderite in his place and demanded surrender 1334661
See how the people of Mariupol relate to the Belarusians. Just a few hours until the city’s liberation 1315889
“Smerch” systems destroy loads with new equipment for Ukrainian nationalists 1289782
Russian special forces under helicopter cover advance deep into the Donbass 1115420
How do the residents of Mariupol relate to the fighters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and soldiers of the Russian Army – look and compare! 1108776

All these videos tell about the Russian invasion of the territory of Ukraine from the perspective of Russian state propaganda, including disinformation narratives.

In analyzing the disinformation narratives in these headlines, several key features can be identified, which are commonly used to manipulate information:

  1. Emotionally charged and provocative headlines: Use of emotionally charged words and phrases designed to provoke a strong reaction or biased attitude. For example, “rescued by Russian troops”, “tormented Russian military”, “grandmother put a Banderite in his place”.
  2. One-sided presentation of information: Presentation of information from only one side, often without context or alternative viewpoints. Headlines like “Polish diplomats were seen off with a military march and the letter Z” or “Denazification of Lviv in four acts!” present information from a clearly one-sided viewpoint.
  3. Use of unverified facts or their distortion: Statements that are difficult to verify or that present facts in a distorted form. Examples include “Another brave grandmother put a Banderite in his place” or “Russian Su-34s covered ‘Azov’ militants’ fortifications with airstrikes”.
  4. Language that demonizes the opponent: Use of terms such as “militants”, “nationalists”, “Banderites”, which attempt to slander or demonize the other side.
  5. Sensational or provocative statements: Headlines created to attract attention through sensationalism or provocation, for example, “Bombing of the ‘Azovstal’ plant in Mariupol from flight altitude” or “Missile strike on the command post of the Armed Forces of Ukraine”.
  6. Fabrication or falsification of events: Statements about events that may be completely fabricated or significantly exaggerated, for example, “The twice-hit BTR of Russian marines blew up on a mine and survived in battle at ‘Azovstal'”.

Twenty videos that were posted from May 10, 2023 to May 10, 2024 and garnered the most views:




Altogether these twenty videos amassed 100 million views! Only two videos do not concern Ukraine, one of which is dedicated to the topic of the alleged deployment of Russian tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus.

Content posted on the official Youtube channel of the publishing house “Belarus Today” covers only actions by the aggressor army of the Russian Federation, which carried out a full-scale invasion of the territory of the neighboring state – Ukraine, additionally spreading disinformation about the actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, defending their country’s territory. Based on the subscriber structure, it can confidently be said that this content is aimed at the Russian internet audience and serves as a circumvention of international sanctions.

Rate article
Factсheck BY

Leave a Reply