On November 27, 2024, political scientist and writer Andrei Lazutkin, during the ONT talk show “ObjectiveLy,” made the following assumption about nuclear escalation in the world:
An important phrase in Putin’s speech was that, well, our next action depends on whether or not there will be a treaty on intermediate- and short-range missiles. That is, this is how the SMO (special military operation) began. So let’s restore it all, or not. And today, Trump was essentially given the suggestion that, like Kennedy, he can come to power without really doing anything, without stopping anyone. This, in principle, is a clever move. This is a missile targeting Europe. Let Europe ask Trump; some sort of link might form there. So, in principle, this is a multi-move strategy, as I understand it, with relatively little bloodshed.
Our verdict, based on the complexity of the problem and the analyses conducted:
Verdict: Mostly Incorrect
Reason: If several statements were made, most of them are false.
Rating Scale
Full video:
We will analyze disinformation narratives and conduct semantic analysis.
The text raises concerns about potential nuclear war and discusses new missile capabilities that may threaten security.
fear-mongering
historical justification
The author hints at political maneuvers related to nuclear strategy, including mentions of Trump and Kennedy.
proposing alternative scenarios
portrayal of a ‘clever move’
The text contains elements of manipulation and fear, emphasizing nuclear threat and political intrigue, which may cause concern among the audience.
political analysis
military technology
analytical
hope
intrigue
people interested in politics and military issues, analysts, students
Stylistic Markers:
discussion-oriented
provocative
